Hemodynamic Effects of Positive-Pressure Ventilation

A ventilator changes the pressure surrounding the heart and great vessels as well as the pressure inflating the lungs. These changes can reduce venous return, alter right ventricular ejection, and ease left ventricular ejection at the same time. Their balance depends on respiratory mechanics, blood volume distribution, cardiac function, and patient effort. Understanding that balance explains why similar airway pressures produce very different circulatory responses.

39.1 Airway, Alveolar, and Pleural Pressures Describe Different Mechanical Effects

Airway pressure is measured within the breathing circuit. Alveolar pressure acts inside the gas-exchange units. Pleural pressure acts outside the lung and contributes to the pressure surrounding intrathoracic vessels and the heart. These pressures are related, but they are not interchangeable.

During inspiratory flow, airway pressure exceeds alveolar pressure because pressure is required to move gas through the endotracheal tube and airways. A high peak airway pressure can therefore reflect high resistance without an equally high alveolar pressure. In a passive patient with open communicating airways, an adequate inspiratory hold removes the flow-related pressure difference and allows plateau pressure to approximate the pressure of communicating alveoli.

The pressure distending the lung is transpulmonary pressure:

P_L is transpulmonary pressure, P_alv is alveolar pressure, and P_pl is pleural pressure. All terms must use the same units, commonly cm H₂O. This expression separates the pressure across the lung from the pressure transmitted outside it.

An increase in pleural pressure can raise the pressure surrounding the right atrium and reduce the gradient carrying systemic venous blood into the chest. An increase in transpulmonary pressure can expand the lung and change the geometry of pulmonary vessels. The first acts strongly on filling; the second can act strongly on right ventricular outflow. Both may occur during the same breath.

The relevant external pressure is also regional. Pleural pressure varies with position and disease, and pressure around the heart includes pericardial influences. One airway measurement cannot specify every vascular or cardiac transmural pressure. Conversely, an airway pressure increase does not automatically imply a matching increase around the heart. The first bedside task is to identify which pressure has actually changed and which structure it acts across.

39.2 Lung and Chest Wall Mechanics Determine Pressure Transmission

For a passive respiratory system, the tidal volume expands both the lung and the chest wall. The airway pressure needed for that expansion is divided between overcoming lung recoil and displacing the chest wall. The division depends on their elastances, meaning the pressure change needed for a given volume change.

In a simplified linear model under static conditions:

Δ denotes a change. E_L is lung elastance and E_cw is chest wall elastance, expressed in cm H₂O/L. The fraction is dimensionless. The complementary part of the alveolar pressure change appears across the lung. This relation assumes passive muscles, stable mechanics, and a suitable estimate of pleural pressure.

Consider an illustrative 0.5-L inflation with lung elastance of 20 and chest wall elastance of 10 cm H₂O/L. Total elastance is 30 cm H₂O/L, so the alveolar pressure change is 0.5 × 30 = 15 cm H₂O. The estimated pleural change is 15 × 10 ÷ 30 = 5 cm H₂O. The transpulmonary change is 15 − 5 = 10 cm H₂O.

Reverse the elastances while retaining the same total and volume. The alveolar change remains 15 cm H₂O, but pleural pressure now rises by 15 × 20 ÷ 30 = 10 cm H₂O, leaving 5 cm H₂O across the lung. The same airway change can therefore impose different filling effects.

Gattinoni and colleagues measured lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary causes of ARDS. Similar total respiratory elastance concealed different contributions from the two components. Their observations support measuring or considering those components, rather than assigning a fixed transmission fraction from a diagnostic label. 1

Recruitment, overdistension, abdominal loading, posture, and regional heterogeneity can change the relationship. The illustrative fractions are not correction factors for an individual patient.

39.3 A Rising Right Atrial Pressure Can Accompany Reduced Effective Filling

A vascular catheter reports intravascular pressure relative to its reference, usually atmospheric pressure at an appropriate anatomical level. The myocardium responds to the pressure difference across its wall and to its volume and geometry. Those are different descriptions of the same chamber.

A conceptual right atrial transmural pressure is:

Both pressures must use the same units and refer to the same physiological moment. The relevant surrounding pressure is local to the chamber; it is not automatically equal to airway pressure, PEEP, or an unvalidated esophageal measurement.

Imagine an illustrative measured right atrial pressure of 8 mm Hg and surrounding pressure of 2 mm Hg. The difference is 8 − 2 = 6 mm Hg. After positive pressure is introduced, suppose the measured pressure becomes 12 mm Hg while surrounding pressure becomes 7 mm Hg. The difference is 12 − 7 = 5 mm Hg.

The catheter pressure has risen by 4 mm Hg while the calculated distending difference has fallen by 1 mm Hg. This demonstrates why a higher central venous pressure after ventilation cannot be interpreted automatically as additional useful preload.

Pinsky and colleagues measured right ventricular volumes and pericardial pressure during PEEP changes in 12 patients after thoracotomy. Right atrial and pericardial pressures increased, while pressure–volume relationships varied and simple filling pressure measures did not reliably describe right ventricular volume. This was a specific postoperative preparation, not validation of a universal bedside subtraction rule. 2

Even an accurately measured transmural pressure is not synonymous with preload in every sense. Ventricular compliance, pericardial constraint, and chamber interaction determine how pressure relates to end-diastolic volume and myocardial stretch. Interpretation should therefore connect catheter pressure with cardiac size, flow, and the timing of the respiratory change. Subtracting an arbitrary fraction of PEEP does not resolve these relationships.

39.4 Venous Return Depends on Both Upstream and Downstream Responses

Systemic venous return is often represented by a pressure–flow model:

P_ms is mean systemic filling pressure, the conceptual equilibrated upstream pressure of the systemic circulation without flow. P_RA is right atrial pressure. R_VR is resistance to venous return. With pressures in mm Hg and resistance in mm Hg·min/L, flow is in L/min. This simplified expression requires compatible pressure references and does not fully describe collapsible venous segments.

Positive pressure can raise right atrial pressure and reduce the driving gradient. However, upstream pressure is not necessarily fixed. Mechanical redistribution of blood, changes in venous capacitance, and reflex venoconstriction can raise mean systemic filling pressure as well. Fessler and colleagues demonstrated both mechanical and reflex contributions in an intact canine preparation; the upstream change was not explained solely by increased abdominal pressure. 3

For illustration, let P_ms be 14 mm Hg, right atrial pressure 6 mm Hg, and R_VR 1.6 mm Hg·min/L. Return is (14 − 6) ÷ 1.6 = 5 L/min. If the pressures become 16 and 10 mm Hg at unchanged resistance, it becomes (16 − 10) ÷ 1.6 = 3.75 L/min. The upstream rise has partly offset the downstream rise, but has not preserved the original gradient.

Abdominal transmission adds competing effects. Compression can mobilize blood centrally, while raising resistance or the critical pressure at an outflow segment. In a separate canine venous-bypass study, Fessler and colleagues found changes in upstream pressure, venous conductance, and the downstream pressure below which flow no longer increased. This shows why a gradient alone can be insufficient. 4

The numerical example holds resistance constant only to isolate the gradient. Actual venous return and cardiac output settle together as vascular mechanics and cardiac function change; the calculation is not an independent prediction of post-intubation output.

39.5 Lung Inflation Can Alter Right Ventricular Afterload in Either Direction

The right ventricle must eject through vessels embedded in the lung. Their mechanical surroundings change with lung volume. Vessels associated with alveolar walls can be narrowed or elongated as alveoli expand. Extra-alveolar vessels can enlarge as surrounding tissue pulls them open. Howell and colleagues demonstrated different responses of pulmonary vascular compartments during inflation in excised dog lungs. 5

At low lung volume, loss of tissue traction and regional collapse can restrict vascular pathways. Recruitment may restore some pathways and improve regional oxygenation, reducing hypoxic vasoconstrictor stimulation. At high regional volume, overdistension can compress vessels, increase dead space, and increase the pressure required for right ventricular ejection. Recruitment and overdistension can coexist in different areas.

Vascular pressure also matters. When surrounding alveolar pressure exceeds downstream venous pressure, it can become an effective limit to flow. The pressure-zone experiments of West and colleagues established this dependence on local arterial, venous, and alveolar pressures in an isolated lung. A region can change its pressure relationship during a breath or after a circulatory change. 6

Consequently, a higher pulmonary arterial pressure does not necessarily mean greater active vasoconstriction, and unchanged pressure does not guarantee unchanged afterload. Flow, vessel recruitment, surrounding pressure, and pulsatile loading must be considered. A failing right ventricle may generate less pressure precisely because it can no longer maintain ejection.

The effects on right ventricular filling and ejection should also be separated. Reduced venous return may make the ventricle smaller, while increased outflow load may cause dilation. The observed size reflects their combined effect together with contractility. Increasing fluid to address every fall in output can therefore be ineffective or harmful when outflow obstruction and ventricular dilation dominate. The response to ventilation requires examination of the right ventricle and the pulmonary circuit, not just the central venous pressure.

39.6 Left Ventricular Filling Changes Through Serial Flow and Ventricular Interaction

The two ventricles pump in series. A reduction in right ventricular stroke volume eventually reduces the blood available to fill the left ventricle. The change is delayed because blood already within the pulmonary circulation continues to reach the left heart. The delay depends on pulmonary blood volume, flow, and heart rate; it is not a fixed number of beats for every patient.

This serial effect explains why the left ventricular response can differ early and late within a respiratory cycle. Inflation may initially displace blood from parts of the pulmonary vascular reservoir toward the left atrium. Reduced right ventricular delivery can then appear as reduced left ventricular filling later. Simultaneous changes in ejection load further alter the arterial waveform.

The ventricles also interact directly through the septum and pericardial space. If right ventricular pressure and volume increase, septal displacement can restrict left ventricular filling. Under pericardial constraint, a change in one chamber can alter the space and distensibility available to another. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure may consequently fail to describe the volume entering the chamber.

Jardin and colleagues combined pressure measurements and echocardiography in 10 patients with ARDS during escalating PEEP. Falling output was accompanied by reduced left ventricular dimensions and changes in septal geometry. At the greatest pressures studied, volume expansion did not restore output despite restoration of measured transmural filling pressure. This historical physiological experiment supports ventricular interaction as one possible mechanism, rather than establishing the response to every contemporary PEEP adjustment. 7

A low left ventricular end-diastolic volume after a ventilator change can therefore arise from reduced systemic venous return, impaired right ventricular ejection, altered pulmonary vascular storage, or ventricular interdependence. These mechanisms require different interpretations. Their distinction matters before treating the small left ventricle as evidence of total-body volume depletion. The upstream right ventricle may be dilated rather than empty.

39.7 Increased Surrounding Pressure Can Ease Left Ventricular Ejection

Left ventricular ejection depends partly on the pressure the ventricle generates relative to its surroundings. When intrathoracic pressure becomes more negative, the ventricular wall must sustain a greater pressure difference for the same arterial pressure measured relative to atmosphere. Raising surrounding pressure can reduce that difference.

A simplified systolic description is:

Use the same units for both terms. This is one determinant of wall stress and ejection load; ventricular radius, wall thickness, arterial impedance, and the spatial distribution of external pressure also matter.

At an illustrative intracavitary systolic pressure of 120 mm Hg and surrounding pressure of −5 mm Hg, the difference is 120 − (−5) = 125 mm Hg. If surrounding pressure becomes +5 mm Hg at the same intracavitary pressure, it is 120 − 5 = 115 mm Hg. This illustrates the mechanical contribution, not a complete quantitative estimate of myocardial afterload.

Buda and colleagues used implanted myocardial markers during pressure maneuvers in eight patients. Large negative intrathoracic pressure impaired ejection despite changes that could otherwise suggest increased filling. Their findings supported increased transmural ejection load as a mechanism. 8

Naughton and colleagues studied patients with congestive heart failure and healthy participants during CPAP. In the heart failure group, reduced inspiratory effort and estimated transmural systolic pressure occurred without a reduction in cardiac index. These physiological findings explain why support can help an overloaded failing left ventricle while a preload-dependent circulation may deteriorate. 9

Clinical benefit must still be assessed separately. In the large 3CPO trial of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, noninvasive ventilation improved respiratory distress and metabolic disturbance more rapidly than standard oxygen, but did not demonstrate a short-term mortality benefit. The trial supports symptomatic and physiological effects without turning the afterload mechanism into a universal survival claim. 10

39.8 Intubation Changes More Than the Direction of Inspiratory Pressure

The transition to invasive ventilation often combines induction medication, loss of muscle activity, positive pressure, altered oxygen and carbon dioxide, and a change in autonomic stimulation. An abrupt fall in blood pressure may reflect several of these changes together.

Before intubation, vigorous inspiration can sustain venous inflow by lowering intrathoracic pressure. Distress may also maintain sympathetic vascular tone. Induction can remove that support while vasodilation increases venous capacitance and lowers the pressure driving return. Myocardial depression, hypoxemia, or changes in heart rate can add further effects. Subsequent inflation may reduce inflow or increase right ventricular outflow load.

The starting disease determines vulnerability. A circulation with severe right ventricular dysfunction or limited effective circulating volume may tolerate the transition poorly. A patient with marked left ventricular failure and large negative inspiratory swings may benefit from unloading, provided sufficient filling and systemic pressure remain. These are physiological patterns rather than guarantees from a diagnostic label.

The international INTUBE observational study documented frequent major peri-intubation events in critically ill patients, including cardiovascular instability. Its findings describe the risk of the whole procedure in real clinical settings. They cannot attribute each event specifically to positive pressure or establish that an associated practice caused the outcome. 11

Nor does the venous return mechanism justify routine fluid for everyone. PREPARE II randomized critically ill adults undergoing intubation with planned positive-pressure ventilation to a crystalloid bolus or no bolus. Among 1,065 analyzed patients, the trial did not show a significant reduction in cardiovascular collapse. Patients for whom fluid was required or contraindicated were excluded, so the result does not prohibit fluid for a separately established indication. 12

Assessment should connect the timing of deterioration to changes in medication, effort, vascular tone, ventilation, and cardiac function. Immediate investigation must also consider complications such as tension pneumothorax or tube obstruction. A single explanation should not be assumed from the sequence alone.

39.9 Breath Timing and Patient Effort Modify the Circulatory Exposure

A brief inspiratory pressure peak and a sustained elevation do not expose the circulation to identical conditions. Inspiratory time, pressure waveform, respiratory rate, end-expiratory pressure, and expiratory emptying determine how long pressure remains elevated. Mean airway pressure summarizes part of that exposure, but does not reveal how much reaches the pleural space or distends each region.

For illustration, imagine a passive square pressure waveform with 20 cm H₂O during inspiration and 5 cm H₂O during expiration. If inspiration occupies one third of the cycle, the time average is 20 × 1/3 + 5 × 2/3 = 10 cm H₂O. If it occupies half the cycle, the average becomes 20 × 1/2 + 5 × 1/2 = 12.5 cm H₂O. Actual ventilator waveforms, pauses, and pressure transitions may differ from this model.

The same peak and PEEP can therefore accompany different mean exposure. However, the example does not predict a cardiac output change. Lung volume, vascular filling, recruitment, and pressure transmission can also change when inspiratory time changes.

Spontaneous effort adds another pressure generator. During an assisted breath, the ventilator may raise airway pressure while inspiratory muscles lower pleural pressure. Transpulmonary pressure can rise substantially even if the displayed airway pressure appears modest. Depending on effort and assistance, pleural pressure may remain negative, become less negative, or become positive.

The accompanying circulatory effects can oppose one another. More negative pressure can favor systemic venous inflow while increasing left ventricular transmural ejection load and right ventricular filling. Muscle unloading can reduce respiratory oxygen demand and the magnitude of these pressure swings. The Naughton study illustrates that unloading effort and changing estimated cardiac load occur together during support. 9

Ventilator mode names therefore do not specify a unique hemodynamic response. Interpretation requires the actual waveform, patient effort, tidal volume, and expiration rather than the label of controlled or assisted ventilation alone.

39.10 Dynamic Hyperinflation Can Sustain Loading Throughout Expiration

When expiration ends before the respiratory system has emptied adequately, successive breaths can establish an elevated end-expiratory lung volume. Gas trapping then creates intrinsic PEEP, meaning positive alveolar pressure above the externally applied end-expiratory pressure in communicating regions. The volume and pressure consequences depend on resistance, recoil, closure, and breathing pattern.

Dynamic hyperinflation can maintain elevated lung volume and surrounding pressures when the clinician expects an expiratory release. It can reduce venous return, increase pulmonary vascular compression, and increase the load on the right ventricle. A nominally low external PEEP does not exclude substantial end-expiratory mechanical loading.

Tuxen and Lane studied nine sedated, paralyzed patients with severe airflow obstruction while changing tidal volume, ventilation, and inspiratory flow. Hyperinflation and circulatory effects depended on the breathing pattern; peak airway pressure did not by itself describe the trapped-volume problem. Their measurements support the importance of expiratory opportunity and lung volume, without defining universal settings for obstructed patients. 13

A high peak pressure from rapid flow through a resistive tube may have a different circulatory meaning from a high plateau or sustained intrinsic PEEP. Slowing inspiratory flow can lower the peak while lengthening inspiration and reducing expiratory time. The displayed pressure can improve as the mechanism causing hyperinflation worsens.

End-expiratory flow that has not returned toward zero raises suspicion for incomplete emptying. In a passive patient, an expiratory hold can estimate total PEEP in communicating units, but closure can conceal regional pressure and expiratory muscle activity can distort the result. Plateau pressure, respiratory waveforms, volume history, and cardiac findings provide complementary information.

Sudden hypotension in an obstructed ventilated patient should therefore prompt assessment of trapped gas alongside vascular, cardiac, and other mechanical causes. The corrective approach must address the actual emptying problem while maintaining necessary ventilation and oxygenation; the physiology does not establish a blanket disconnection maneuver or one acceptable carbon dioxide value.

39.11 Respiratory Hemodynamic Variation Is a Conditional Physiological Test

Positive-pressure breaths repeatedly alter filling and ejection. When stroke volume lies on a preload-sensitive part of ventricular function, a respiratory reduction in filling can produce a larger change in output. This creates useful information, provided the pressure challenge and cardiac response can be interpreted.

Arterial pulse pressure variation describes the changing difference between systolic and diastolic pressure across the respiratory cycle. Michard and colleagues related this signal to the cardiac output response to volume expansion in 40 mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis-related circulatory failure. The study established predictive value under its measurement conditions, rather than a universal instruction to administer fluid above one percentage. 14

The size of the imposed challenge matters. Small tidal volumes or limited pleural pressure transmission can create a weak respiratory signal despite preload responsiveness. De Backer and colleagues demonstrated that tidal volume influenced the ability of pulse pressure variation to classify fluid responses. A value derived under one ventilation condition cannot be transferred automatically to another. 15

Other mechanisms complicate interpretation. Irregular cardiac rhythm introduces beat-to-beat variation unrelated to the respiratory challenge. Spontaneous effort changes its magnitude and direction. Increased right ventricular outflow load can generate variation because the ventricle ejects poorly during inflation; additional fluid may then worsen dilation. Abdominal pressure, open-chest conditions, arterial compliance, and the number of heartbeats per breath also affect the signal.

Respiratory variation is consequently evidence requiring a physiological context. Fluid responsiveness describes a potential rise in flow after increased preload; it does not establish that flow is inadequate, that fluid is tolerated, or that fluid is the best intervention. When the respiratory test is unsuitable, another reversible preload test with direct flow assessment may answer a different part of the problem.

The same caution applies to vena caval size changes and respiratory swings in catheter pressures. They reflect interaction between pressure, flow, and compliance rather than functioning as direct volume gauges.

39.12 Integrate Pressure, Flow, Oxygen Transport, and the Timing of Change

Consider an illustrative patient whose cardiac output is 5 L/min, right atrial pressure 8 mm Hg, and arterial oxygen content 16 mL O₂/dL before a ventilator adjustment. Afterward, oxygenation improves and content rises to 16.5 mL O₂/dL, but output falls to 3.8 L/min and right atrial pressure rises to 13 mm Hg. Assume the measurements are reliable and represent stable periods.

Systemic oxygen delivery is:

DO₂ is in mL O₂/min when output is in L/min and arterial content, CaO₂, is in mL O₂/dL. The factor of 10 converts liters to deciliters. Initial delivery is 5 × 16 × 10 = 800 mL O₂/min. After the change it is 3.8 × 16.5 × 10 = 627 mL O₂/min. Better arterial oxygen content has not compensated for reduced blood flow.

The higher right atrial pressure does not identify the cause. If surrounding pressure increased more than atrial pressure, reduced effective filling remains possible. If the right ventricle dilated with septal displacement, increased outflow load and ventricular interaction become more concerning. Dynamic hyperinflation, altered effort, medication changes, and new mechanical complications remain possible contributors according to timing and findings.

The next interpretation should connect actual airway and expiratory waveforms with ventricular geometry, flow, systemic pressure, and perfusion. A monitored change that modifies one suspected mechanism can strengthen the inference, provided its other effects are recognized. A response is evidence about that patient under those conditions, rather than a universal pressure prescription.

This integrated approach also applies when support improves the circulation. Reduced inspiratory effort and lower left ventricular ejection load may outweigh a modest reduction in filling. The central question is whether ventilation has improved the combined ability to exchange gases and sustain tissue oxygen transport. Neither a higher saturation nor a lower airway pressure answers that question alone.

References

1. Gattinoni L, Pelosi P, Suter PM, Pedoto A, Vercesi P, Lissoni A. Acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease. Different syndromes?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:3–11.

2. Pinsky MR, Desmet JM, Vincent JL. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:681–687.

3. Fessler HE, Brower RG, Wise RA, Permutt S. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the gradient for venous return. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;143:19–24.

4. Fessler HE, Brower RG, Wise RA, Permutt S. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the canine venous return curve. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:4–10.

5. Howell JBL, Permutt S, Proctor DF, Riley RL. Effect of inflation of the lung on different parts of pulmonary vascular bed. J Appl Physiol. 1961;16:71–76.

6. West JB, Dollery CT, Naimark A. Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung; relation to vascular and alveolar pressures. J Appl Physiol. 1964;19:713–724.

7. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Boisante L, Curien N, Margairaz A, Bourdarias JP. Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:387–392.

8. Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB Jr, Daughters GT II, Stinson EB, Alderman EL. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:453–459.

9. Naughton MT, Rahman MA, Hara K, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on intrathoracic and left ventricular transmural pressures in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995;91:1725–1731.

10. Gray A, Goodacre S, Newby DE, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:142–151.

11. Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, et al. Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries. JAMA. 2021;325:1164–1172.

12. Russell DW, Casey JD, Gibbs KW, et al. Effect of fluid bolus administration on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill patients undergoing tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328:270–279.

13. Tuxen DV, Lane S. The effects of ventilatory pattern on hyperinflation, airway pressures, and circulation in mechanical ventilation of patients with severe air-flow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136:872–879.

14. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:134–138.

15. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:517–523.