Cardiovascular Effects of Spontaneous Breathing

Spontaneous inspiration changes the pressure around the heart while inflating the lungs. It can increase right-heart filling, alter pulmonary vascular loading, and impede left ventricular ejection within the same breath. The response depends on the strength of the effort and on what the circulation can accept and deliver.

38.1 Inspiration Changes the Environment Around the Heart

During spontaneous inspiration, the diaphragm and other inspiratory muscles expand the thorax. Pleural pressure falls, increasing the pressure across the lung and allowing lung volume to rise. With an open airway, alveolar pressure becomes slightly lower than pressure at the airway opening during inspiratory flow. These are related changes, but pleural pressure, alveolar pressure, and lung volume describe different influences on the circulation.

The heart and intrathoracic vessels experience the changing pressure around them. Much of the systemic vascular reservoir lies outside the thorax and does not experience the same pressure change. Inspiration therefore changes the relationship between the heart and the vessels supplying and receiving its blood.

A catheter measures intravascular pressure relative to its reference, usually atmospheric pressure after appropriate leveling and zeroing. The pressure distending a chamber is the difference between its internal pressure and the local pressure outside its wall. This transmural pressure can change differently from the displayed catheter pressure.

Local surrounding pressure is not always identical to one global pleural pressure. The pericardium, cardiac contact, posture, lung disease, and regional pressure gradients influence the pressure actually applied to the heart. For initial reasoning, pleural pressure can approximate the changing external pressure, provided this assumption remains explicit.

Esophageal pressure offers an accessible estimate of pleural-pressure behavior. Correct balloon filling, position, signal quality, and validation are necessary. In an original study of controlled and assisted ventilation, Chiumello and colleagues showed that absolute end-expiratory esophageal pressure could change with balloon position and paralysis even when the pressure-change relationship during occlusion remained relatively consistent. A satisfactory swing measurement does not guarantee an exact local pericardial pressure. 1

Assisted breathing combines muscle-generated negative pressure with ventilator-generated positive airway pressure. Pleural pressure may fall substantially, remain near its starting value, or rise, depending on effort, assistance, and mechanics. Calling a breath patient-triggered does not define its cardiovascular effect. Determine the pressure pattern actually produced.

38.2 Lower Right Atrial Pressure Can Increase Systemic Venous Return

Systemic venous return depends on the pressure available to drain blood toward the right atrium and on the resistance along that pathway. In a simplified steady-state model, mean systemic filling pressure represents the upstream pressure generated by stressed systemic vascular volume. Right atrial pressure is the downstream pressure while the connecting veins remain open.

Let venous return be V̇R in L/min, mean systemic filling pressure Pms and right atrial pressure Pra in mm Hg, and resistance to venous return Rvr in mm Hg·min/L.

A fall in pleural pressure often lowers measured Pra. If upstream pressure does not fall equally, the gradient increases and more blood can enter the thorax. The right atrium need not develop a lower pressure across its own wall for this to happen.

Define transmural right atrial pressure, Pra,tm, as internal Pra minus local surrounding pressure, Pext, with both expressed in mm Hg.

Consider illustrative pressures measured at comparable points in the cardiac cycle. Before inspiration, Pra is 6 mm Hg and surrounding pressure is −3 mm Hg. Transmural pressure is 6 − (−3) = 9 mm Hg. During inspiration, Pra falls to 2 while surrounding pressure falls to −8. Transmural pressure becomes 2 − (−8) = 10 mm Hg.

The displayed central venous pressure has fallen, while the pressure distending the atrium has increased slightly. If Pms were held at 12 mm Hg, the modeled return gradient would rise from 12 − 6 = 6 to 12 − 2 = 10 mm Hg. This demonstrates the direction of the pressure change, not a measured flow prediction.

The example assumes that surrounding pressure represents the atrial environment, the catheter reflects Pra, and upstream pressure and resistance are stable. Actual inspiration can change abdominal pressure, venous geometry, and cardiac performance. More inflow also produces more forward output only if the right ventricle can receive and eject the additional blood.

38.3 Collapsible Veins and Abdominal Pressure Limit the Respiratory Pump

The venous pathway is not a rigid pipe. Thin-walled veins can narrow when their internal pressure becomes insufficient relative to surrounding pressure. Once a segment becomes flow limiting, lowering pressure farther downstream does not produce the increase predicted by a simple fixed-resistance equation.

This resembles a vascular waterfall. Upstream flow becomes governed partly by the pressure needed to keep the limiting segment open, rather than by right atrial pressure alone. Stronger inspiratory suction can then deepen the pressure swing without proportionally increasing venous return.

The location and surrounding pressure matter. Veins near the thoracic inlet, abdominal veins, and the vena cava encounter different external pressures. There is no single atmospheric-pressure cutoff that identifies flow limitation throughout the systemic venous circulation.

Diaphragmatic descent usually raises abdominal pressure while lowering pleural pressure. Compression of abdominal venous reservoirs can increase the pressure driving blood toward the chest. However, the same compression can narrow the inferior vena cava and increase resistance if its distending pressure is low. The abdomen can supply blood or obstruct its return according to the pressure relationships.

Takata, Wise, and Robotham tested this distinction in canine experiments using an inferior vena caval bypass. Increasing abdominal pressure increased or decreased caval return depending on the intravascular-to-abdominal pressure relationship. Their study supports a conditional response, not the assumption that every diaphragmatic contraction must increase venous return. Its experimental closing pressures are not universal human thresholds. 2

Active expiration adds another pattern. Abdominal muscle contraction can raise abdominal and pleural pressures together, redistribute blood, and alter the pressure measured at the end of expiration. End expiration is therefore not automatically a relaxed reference state in a distressed patient.

Volume distribution, venous tone, abdominal loading, and right-heart reserve determine the net result. A visibly collapsing vein establishes a changing vessel geometry; it does not independently establish fluid depletion or prove that increasing blood volume will improve the patient's overall state.

38.4 Right Ventricular Preload and Afterload Change Together

An inspiratory increase in systemic return raises right ventricular filling only to the extent allowed by the atrium, ventricle, and pericardium. On the ascending portion of the ventricular function relationship, additional end-diastolic stretch can increase stroke volume. With severe right ventricular dysfunction or external constraint, additional filling may instead raise distending pressure and chamber volume without a useful output increase.

At the same time, lung inflation changes the pulmonary vessels through which the right ventricle must eject. Extra-alveolar vessels are pulled open by surrounding lung tissue, whereas alveolar vessels can become narrowed as alveoli expand. The net response depends on starting lung volume, regional inflation, vascular pressure, and recruitment of the vascular bed.

At low volumes, loss of tissue traction and derecruitment can raise pulmonary vascular resistance. At high volumes, alveolar-vessel compression can also raise it. This explains why the same inflation can relieve one mechanical limitation while creating another. A single whole-lung resistance value also omits pulsatile load and regional differences.

Whittenberger and colleagues controlled inflation and blood flow in an open-chest canine preparation. High inflation increased vascular resistance, while the relationship also depended on flow, pressure, and inflation history. The study establishes a mechanical effect of inflation without defining one optimal lung volume or bedside pressure for every right ventricle. 3

Lower pleural pressure by itself should not be labeled an increase in right ventricular afterload. Pulmonary arterial and cardiac surroundings may both change, while lung distension changes the vascular pathway separately. A pulmonary artery pressure measured relative to atmosphere cannot identify the complete ejection load without these relationships.

Obstructive hyperinflation, hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and acidemia can add vascular loading to the mechanical effects. In that setting, inspiration may deliver more blood to a right ventricle that is simultaneously less able to eject it. Distension then becomes a possible source of adverse ventricular interaction rather than evidence of improved systemic flow.

38.5 The Pulmonary Circulation Separates Immediate and Delayed Effects

The ventricles operate in series, but an increase in right ventricular output is not delivered instantaneously to the left ventricle. Blood must pass through a pulmonary vascular bed that contains a substantial blood volume and can store or release blood during a breath.

Consequently, right and left ventricular stroke volumes can differ transiently. Over a sufficiently stable interval their mean outputs must balance, apart from relevant shunts, but equality of mean flow does not require identical beat-to-beat changes.

An inspiratory increase in right-heart output can contribute to left-heart filling after pulmonary transit. The timing depends on flow, pulmonary blood volume, heart rate, and respiratory frequency. It should not be assigned a fixed number of beats in every patient. Rapid breathing can make the relationships between one inspiration and a later arterial pulse especially difficult to separate visually.

Inflation also changes pulmonary vascular capacitance. Expansion of extra-alveolar vessels can retain blood, whereas compression of alveolar vessels can displace blood toward the left atrium. Which effect dominates depends on vascular and alveolar pressure relationships.

Brower and colleagues examined isolated canine lungs with constant inflow. Inflation transiently reduced pulmonary venous flow under predominantly zone 2 conditions but increased it under predominantly zone 3 conditions. Thus inflation did not invariably sequester blood or invariably expel it toward the left heart. The study identifies a mechanism, not a fixed clinical response in an intact breathing patient. 4

This timing distinction prevents a common error. A fall in left ventricular output during the first inspiratory effort cannot automatically be explained by failure of blood returning through the lungs several beats later. Direct effects on ventricular interaction, filling, and ejection must also be considered.

Conversely, later changes in arterial flow may reflect earlier right-heart events. Read respiratory timing together with the cardiac cycle and duration of the observation. An arterial pulse is the final output of several interacting processes, not a direct instantaneous display of systemic venous return.

38.6 Ventricular Interdependence Can Reduce Left Ventricular Filling

The ventricles share the interventricular septum, myocardial connections, and the space constrained by the pericardium. A change in one ventricle can therefore alter the filling and shape of the other before additional blood traverses the pulmonary circulation.

If inspiration increases right ventricular volume, the septum can shift toward the left ventricle and external constraint on left ventricular filling can increase. The left ventricle may then accept less blood at the same intracavitary filling pressure. Alternatively, maintaining the same volume may require a higher pressure. The degree of constraint depends on total cardiac volume and pericardial properties.

Pressure loading of the right ventricle also changes septal configuration and contraction. A failing, distended right ventricle can reduce left-heart filling through both mechanical interaction and inadequate forward flow. Those are distinct pathways and can coexist.

In human Doppler experiments, Guz, Innes, and Murphy observed an inspiratory decrease in left ventricular stroke volume that appeared with the first effort and persisted without respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Responses in the small pericardectomy subgroup were attenuated. These observations support a direct mechanical contribution, while their small selected groups do not quantify its importance in every ICU patient. 5

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia can modify the observed pattern by changing heart rate and filling time. It is not necessary for a mechanical respiratory variation to occur. Similarly, changes in arterial pulse pressure reflect arterial properties and pressure transmission as well as stroke volume.

An inspiratory left ventricular stroke-volume fall can therefore be expected physiology. A larger fall can accompany strong effort, obstruction, right ventricular loading, or increased pericardial constraint. It does not uniquely identify hypovolemia. The same sign can arise from very different starting volumes and ventricular conditions.

Assess chamber dimensions, septal motion, ventricular function, and the respiratory effort producing the change. Giving fluid solely because the arterial pulse varies can worsen a distended right ventricle or raise pulmonary venous pressure without correcting the dominant mechanism.

38.7 Negative Surrounding Pressure Increases Left Ventricular Ejection Load

The left ventricle must develop pressure relative to its surroundings to eject into the systemic circulation. Much of that circulation lies outside the thorax. Making the ventricular environment more negative increases the pressure across the ventricular wall required for a given intracavitary systolic pressure.

Let PLV be intracavitary left ventricular pressure and Psurround the local external pressure, both in mm Hg. Their difference is the transmural ventricular pressure, PLV,tm.

For an illustrative systolic PLV of 110 mm Hg with surrounding pressure −5, transmural pressure is 110 − (−5) = 115 mm Hg. During a stronger effort, suppose intracavitary pressure falls to 105 but surrounding pressure falls to −20. Transmural pressure becomes 105 − (−20) = 125 mm Hg. Internal systolic pressure has fallen by 5 while the pressure across the wall has risen by 10.

This arithmetic explains why a lower displayed arterial pressure does not necessarily mean easier ventricular ejection. Estimating PLV from central aortic pressure assumes an open aortic valve, no important outflow gradient, and comparable timing. Substituting esophageal pressure for local external pressure adds another approximation.

Transmural pressure is only one component of afterload. Wall stress also depends on ventricular size and thickness; arterial resistance, compliance, wave reflection, and flow influence the full ejection load. Subtracting pleural pressure from systolic pressure does not calculate all myocardial work or establish contractility.

Buda and colleagues studied respiratory pressure maneuvers in eight patients with implanted myocardial markers. During the Müller maneuver, ventricular shortening and ejection fraction decreased despite increased ventricular volume and lower arterial pressure. Relating pressure to the changing thoracic environment supported increased transmural ejection load as a mechanism. 6

Karam and colleagues also found reduced inspiratory ejection during threshold-loaded breathing in healthy subjects, with increased end-systolic counts rather than a significant mean end-diastolic-count change. Different loading experiments can therefore emphasize ejection or filling effects. Neither mechanism should be assumed to explain every respiratory fall in stroke volume. 7

38.8 Obstruction Can Turn Normal Interactions Into Pulmonary Edema

Quiet inspiration produces modest changes. Airway obstruction can require much larger negative pleural-pressure swings to generate flow. If expiration is also limited, dynamic hyperinflation raises end-expiratory volume and intrinsic PEEP, adding an inspiratory threshold load before useful flow begins.

The resulting circulation faces several simultaneous stresses. Systemic return may increase until venous limitation or cardiac constraint intervenes. Pulmonary vascular loading and right ventricular distension can increase. Left ventricular filling can be restricted by interaction while ejection is impeded by negative surrounding pressure.

Jardin and colleagues studied nine patients with status asthmaticus using hemodynamics, esophageal pressure, and echocardiography. Inspiratory right-heart enlargement, leftward septal displacement, and smaller left-heart dimensions accompanied marked pressure swings. The findings support interacting filling and right ventricular ejection mechanisms; they do not make pulsus paradoxus a specific sign of low circulating volume. 8

Forceful inspiration against an obstructed upper airway can also produce negative-pressure pulmonary edema. A very negative interstitial environment increases the hydrostatic pressure difference across pulmonary microvascular walls. Increased central blood delivery and impaired left ventricular ejection can further raise the filtration tendency.

Fluid filtration depends on pressure differences across the barrier, its permeability, oncotic forces, and fluid clearance. A low pressure measured relative to atmosphere does not exclude a high pressure driving fluid outward when surrounding tissue pressure is even lower. Normal resting left ventricular systolic function does not exclude this mechanism.

Fremont and colleagues sampled edema fluid in ten patients with postobstructive pulmonary edema identified from a pulmonary edema cohort. Protein ratios and preserved net alveolar fluid clearance supported an important hydrostatic mechanism. The small observational series does not establish that all cases have an intact barrier or exclude stress-related permeability injury. 9

Recognizing the mechanism directs attention to obstruction, effort, oxygenation, and the evolving circulation. It does not justify inferring fluid overload from edema alone or assuming that every case requires the same cardiovascular intervention.

38.9 Breathing Effort Adds an Oxygen Requirement

Respiratory muscles consume oxygen to generate pressure and move the chest and lungs. Obstruction, reduced compliance, intrinsic PEEP, and inefficient muscle geometry can increase this requirement. Strong pressure generation against little flow still requires muscular energy; a small delivered tidal volume does not demonstrate low effort.

The cardiovascular system must meet this additional demand while responding to the pressure changes just described. Tachycardia and sympathetic activation may increase output, but also increase myocardial demand. A limited coronary supply or ventricular reserve can make the transition difficult even if arterial oxygen saturation initially remains acceptable.

Field, Kelly, and Macklem compared oxygen consumption during spontaneous and artificial ventilation in thirteen patients with cardiorespiratory disease. They found that the oxygen cost attributed to breathing could be substantial and varied widely. The method compares physiological states rather than measuring muscle metabolism directly, so its exact fraction should not be assigned to every patient. 10

An illustrative oxygen balance shows the consequence of an unmet increase in demand. Let cardiac output be 5 L/min and arterial oxygen content 18 mL O₂/dL. Delivery is 5 × 10 × 18 = 900 mL O₂/min, where 10 converts liters to deciliters. Total consumption of 300 mL/min requires extraction of 300/900 = one-third of delivered oxygen.

If consumption rises to 360 while delivery stays 900, extraction becomes 360/900 = 40%. By the Fick balance, mixed venous content falls from 18 − 300/(5 × 10) = 12 to 18 − 360/50 = 10.8 mL O₂/dL. This is a constructed example, assuming a stable balance, unchanged arterial content, and representative mixed venous sampling.

Jubran and colleagues observed different oxygen-transport responses during successful and failed spontaneous-breathing trials. Their small cohort illustrates that patients can meet a breathing transition through increased transport or increased extraction. A falling mixed venous saturation identifies a changing supply–demand relationship, not respiratory-muscle failure or myocardial ischemia by itself. 11

38.10 A Spontaneous Breathing Trial Changes Cardiac Loading

Transition from controlled positive-pressure ventilation to spontaneous breathing removes part of the pressure support around the heart and transfers work to the respiratory muscles. Venous return can increase, left ventricular transmural ejection load can rise, and metabolic demand can increase together. Changes in sympathetic tone and blood distribution add to these mechanical effects.

A vulnerable left ventricle may be unable to accommodate the additional filling without a sharp pressure rise. Impaired relaxation, a stiff ventricle, ischemia, mitral regurgitation, or inadequate systolic reserve can contribute. Pulmonary venous and microvascular pressures can then rise sufficiently to produce weaning-induced pulmonary edema.

Lemaire and colleagues described this transition in fifteen patients with severe COPD and cardiovascular disease. Short spontaneous ventilation produced a marked rise in estimated transmural pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, requiring reinstitution of ventilation. Importantly, cardiac index increased and ejection fraction remained unchanged while left ventricular volume increased. A rising output or preserved ejection fraction therefore does not exclude intolerance through excessive filling pressure. 12

This was a selected mechanistic cohort, not a prevalence study or randomized treatment trial. Its subsequent treatment experience cannot define a universal fluid-removal strategy. Pulmonary edema during a trial may reflect redistribution and limited cardiac reserve as well as excess total body fluid.

The trial's mode also matters. Pressure support and PEEP can reduce effort and alter the loading conditions that would occur without that assistance. Cabello and colleagues compared three trial conditions in fourteen difficult-to-wean patients in random order. T-piece breathing produced greater effort and different filling-pressure responses than assisted conditions. This short physiological comparison does not establish one trial method or setting for every patient. 13

Weaning intolerance is not always cardiac. Respiratory-muscle limitations, gas-exchange deterioration, airway problems, and other causes can overlap. The relevant question is which demands and loading changes exceed the patient's reserve during the observed transition.

38.11 Interpret Respiratory Variation Through the Whole Circulation

Begin by identifying what the patient and ventilator are doing. Relate airway pressure, flow, effort, and the arterial waveform to the same breaths. Distinguish quiet inspiration, forceful obstructive effort, active expiration, and mixed effort with positive-pressure assistance. Their identical labels on a monitor can conceal different pressure patterns.

Then separate the measurements. A lower measured CVP may coexist with a higher transmural right atrial pressure. An inspiratory arterial-pressure fall may reflect altered filling, ejection load, arterial transmission, or several effects together. A large swing does not specify how much volume is missing or whether fluid would be tolerated.

Airapetian and colleagues prospectively studied inferior vena caval variability and flow responses to fluid in spontaneously breathing ICU patients. Overall predictive discrimination was limited, despite more informative extreme changes within the studied population. Their results reinforce the importance of effort and context rather than providing a universal collapsibility or pulse-variation trigger. 14

During a breathing trial, compare ventricular size, septal behavior, systolic function, mitral flow, and available filling-pressure evidence before and during the change. Lamia and colleagues compared Doppler indices with invasive pressure changes in patients with repeated trial failure. Their diagnostic study supports looking for evolving cardiac filling abnormalities, but its selected population and derived cutoffs do not define a universal trial threshold. 15

For example, a constructed patient develops stronger negative efforts, hypertension, new pulmonary congestion, and rising estimated left-heart filling pressure during reduced assistance. These findings can fit increasing ejection load and limited filling reserve, even if the arterial pulse varies and measured CVP falls. Another patient may instead have flow-limited venous return and inadequate forward flow without congestion.

The useful explanation connects the pressure outside the heart, venous supply, right ventricular ejection, pulmonary transit, ventricular interaction, and oxygen demand. Judge any change in support by the response across that system. A smoother arterial waveform alone is not proof that perfusion, respiratory work, and pulmonary fluid balance have improved.

References

1. Chiumello D, Consonni D, Coppola S, Froio S, Crimella F, Colombo A. The occlusion tests and end-expiratory esophageal pressure: measurements and comparison in controlled and assisted ventilation. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:13. doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0112-1

2. Takata M, Wise RA, Robotham JL. Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69(6):1961–1972. doi:10.1152/jappl.1990.69.6.1961

3. Whittenberger JL, McGregor M, Berglund E, Borst HG. Influence of state of inflation of the lung on pulmonary vascular resistance. J Appl Physiol. 1960;15(5):878–882. doi:10.1152/jappl.1960.15.5.878

4. Brower R, Wise RA, Hassapoyannes C, Bromberger-Barnea B, Permutt S. Effect of lung inflation on lung blood volume and pulmonary venous flow. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58(3):954–963. doi:10.1152/jappl.1985.58.3.954

5. Guz A, Innes JA, Murphy K. Respiratory modulation of left ventricular stroke volume in man measured using pulsed Doppler ultrasound. J Physiol. 1987;393:499–512. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016836

6. Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB Jr, Daughters GT II, Stinson EB, Alderman EL. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(9):453–459. doi:10.1056/NEJM197908303010901

7. Karam M, Wise RA, Natarajan TK, Permutt S, Wagner HN. Mechanism of decreased left ventricular stroke volume during inspiration in man. Circulation. 1984;69(5):866–873. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.69.5.866

8. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Boisante L, Prost JF, Gueret P, Bourdarias JP. Mechanism of paradoxic pulse in bronchial asthma. Circulation. 1982;66(4):887–894. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.66.4.887

9. Fremont RD, Kallet RH, Matthay MA, Ware LB. Postobstructive pulmonary edema: a case for hydrostatic mechanisms. Chest. 2007;131(6):1742–1746. doi:10.1378/chest.06-2934

10. Field S, Kelly SM, Macklem PT. The oxygen cost of breathing in patients with cardiorespiratory disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(1):9–13. doi:10.1164/arrd.1982.126.1.9

11. Jubran A, Mathru M, Dries D, Tobin MJ. Continuous recordings of mixed venous oxygen saturation during weaning from mechanical ventilation and the ramifications thereof. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(6):1763–1769. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9804056

12. Lemaire F, Teboul JL, Cinotti L, et al. Acute left ventricular dysfunction during unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 1988;69(2):171–179. doi:10.1097/00000542-198808000-00004

13. Cabello B, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Brochard L, Gómez FJ, Mancebo J. Physiological comparison of three spontaneous breathing trials in difficult-to-wean patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(7):1171–1179. doi:10.1007/s00134-010-1870-0

14. Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care. 2015;19:400. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9

15. Lamia B, Maizel J, Ochagavia A, et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure elevation during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1696–1701. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819f13d0