Obstructive Shock and Acute Right Ventricular Failure

An obstructed circulation can contain ample blood and a contracting left ventricle yet deliver inadequate forward flow. The limiting mechanism may lie in pulmonary outflow, cardiac filling under external constraint, or pressure transmission through the thorax. Acute right ventricular failure often participates, but identifying its presence does not establish which mechanical or myocardial process caused it.

73.1 Identify the Bottleneck in the Circulatory Pathway

Obstructive shock describes inadequate circulation produced by a mechanical limitation to filling or forward flow. Pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade, and tension-related thoracic pressure create different bottlenecks. Severe dynamic hyperinflation can impose related limitations without an anatomical thrombus or pericardial collection.

The resulting low output can resemble hypovolemia because little blood reaches the left ventricle. The distinction is that adding upstream volume does not necessarily overcome the limitation. It may instead increase venous pressure, right ventricular distension, or external constraint while forward delivery remains inadequate.

Right ventricular failure is a functional state in which the right heart cannot provide the required pulmonary flow without unacceptable upstream pressure or other consequences. It can arise from excessive afterload, impaired contractility, abnormal rhythm, or combinations. Right ventricular infarction therefore belongs in the differential of acute failure even though the primary mechanism is myocardial injury rather than an extracardiac obstruction.

The mechanical question is where the effective pressure–flow relationship has changed. Pulmonary vascular obstruction increases the load opposing ejection. Pericardial pressure reduces the pressure available to distend cardiac chambers. Increased thoracic pressure can alter venous return and pulmonary load simultaneously. Their monitor patterns overlap because all can restrict blood delivery through the lungs to the left heart.

The accompanying findings depend on compensation and timing. Systemic vasoconstriction and tachycardia can initially preserve arterial pressure despite declining stroke volume. Venous pressure can rise, but its absolute level also depends on circulating volume and the external pressure reference. No single pressure pattern is obligatory at every stage.

Assessment must therefore connect anatomy, pressure, flow, geometry, and the event's time course. A small left ventricular cavity, a dilated right ventricle, or an elevated central venous pressure is a clue to the mechanism, not the mechanism itself.

The integrated goal is to explain why blood cannot move through the pathway and how that limitation interacts with the remaining cardiovascular reserve.

73.2 Acute Afterload Can Outstrip Right Ventricular Adaptation

The right ventricle normally ejects into a relatively low-pressure circulation. An abrupt increase in pulmonary load requires more force and changes the timing and efficiency of ejection. The load includes resistance, pulmonary arterial compliance, wave reflection, and downstream pressure, rather than pulmonary artery pressure alone.

Initially, increased contractile activation and recruitment of filling reserve may preserve stroke volume. This adaptation has limits. When contraction cannot match the altered load, more blood remains at end systole, the chamber enlarges, and end-diastolic pressure rises. The pressure–volume relationship changes as the ventricle moves from compensation toward ineffective ejection.

Dilation can increase wall stress and impair tricuspid leaflet coaptation. Regurgitant flow then adds work without delivering equivalent blood through the lungs. A ventricle showing vigorous movement can consequently produce little effective forward output if much of its motion occurs against excessive load or backward through the valve.

Myocardial oxygen supply becomes more precarious at the same time. Increased pressure and wall tension raise demand and can impede intramyocardial perfusion, while declining systemic pressure reduces coronary driving conditions. Tachycardia further increases demand and reduces time available for diastolic perfusion.

Gold and Bache demonstrated systolic impedance to right ventricular subendocardial perfusion during acute pressure loading in awake dogs under controlled experimental conditions. The study explains a mechanism by which limited coronary reserve can contribute to failure; it does not define a universal pulmonary pressure at which human ischemia begins. 1

This creates a reinforcing cycle: load impairs ejection, dilation and regurgitation increase, coronary conditions worsen, and contraction deteriorates further. Falling left ventricular inflow then lowers systemic pressure and aggravates the coronary problem.

A falling pulmonary artery pressure can occur late in this sequence because the ventricle can no longer generate flow and pressure. It must not be mistaken for relief of the obstruction without examining output, geometry, and systemic perfusion.

73.3 Acute Embolism, Chronic Pulmonary Hypertension, and Infarction Differ

Pulmonary embolism reduces the available pulmonary vascular pathways and can alter vasomotor tone and gas exchange. Its hemodynamic effect depends on the distribution of obstruction, the preexisting circulation, and right ventricular reserve. Anatomical clot burden is therefore not a complete measure of the functional insult.

A previously normal right ventricle has little time to increase muscle mass or reorganize its pressure-generating apparatus. Acute loading can produce marked dilation and failure at pressures that a chronically adapted ventricle previously tolerated. There is no single pressure ceiling that reliably separates acute embolism from chronic disease.

Chronic pulmonary hypertension allows hypertrophy and other remodeling, but that adaptation can bring stiffness, increased oxygen requirements, and limited reserve. Rain and colleagues linked right ventricular diastolic impairment in pulmonary arterial hypertension to tissue and cardiomyocyte properties. A chronically thickened ventricle may generate high pressures while remaining vulnerable to an acute additional load. 2

Acute deterioration can consequently occur on chronic pulmonary vascular disease through infection, arrhythmia, hypoxemia, embolism, or altered ventilation. Prior imaging, earlier hemodynamics, chamber morphology, and the time course help identify that background, but no isolated structural feature provides certainty.

Right ventricular infarction differs because impaired myocardial perfusion and contractility can be primary. Septal involvement, atrioventricular conduction, right atrial function, and accompanying left ventricular injury influence the output. Pulmonary pressure may be modest because the ventricle lacks force rather than because its function is adequate.

Bowers and colleagues studied 53 patients undergoing angioplasty for acute right ventricular infarction. Successful reperfusion was associated with improved ventricular performance and outcomes. The comparison supports the importance of restoring the ischemic territory, while success versus failure of reperfusion was not a randomized contrast and cannot isolate every causal contribution. 3

These distinctions prevent a treatment effect from being assigned to the wrong problem. Reducing pulmonary resistance, relieving a thrombotic obstruction, restoring coronary perfusion, and correcting an arrhythmia address different limitations even when the visible endpoint is right ventricular failure.

73.4 Ventricular and Pericardial Interaction Can Further Restrict Output

Right and left ventricles interact in series: reduced right ventricular output means less pulmonary venous return reaches the left ventricle over subsequent beats. Preserved left ventricular contractility cannot compensate indefinitely for inadequate inflow.

They also interact mechanically through shared myocardium, the septum, and the pericardial enclosure. A dilating right ventricle can displace the septum and alter left ventricular geometry. Once pericardial accommodation becomes limited, further expansion can increase surrounding pressure and reduce left ventricular distension.

The relevant pressure is transmural: pressure inside a chamber minus its local surrounding pressure. A rise in measured diastolic pressure can therefore coexist with lower distending pressure and a smaller cavity if surrounding pressure rises even more.

For a constructed example, suppose left ventricular diastolic pressure is 18 mmHg and local surrounding pressure 16 mmHg. The transmural difference is 2 mmHg. In another state, internal pressure is 12 and surrounding pressure 6 mmHg, giving 6 mmHg. The lower measured filling pressure accompanies greater distending pressure under those assumed conditions.

These values are not directly inferred from routine wedge or central venous measurements. Estimating the appropriate external pressure is difficult, regional pressures can differ, and neither difference directly measures myocardial stretch. The example demonstrates why atmospheric-reference pressure alone can mislead.

Belenkie and colleagues examined volume loading in anesthetized, ventilated dogs with experimental pulmonary embolism. After repeated embolizations, additional loading enlarged the right ventricle while reducing an index of left ventricular filling and stroke work. The experiment demonstrates a mechanism of harm from added volume in severe loading, not a universal fluid strategy for all embolism. 4

Thus, a small left ventricle beside a large right ventricle does not automatically justify increasing volume. The limitation may be poor right ventricular ejection, septal displacement, increased pericardial constraint, or all three. The response of forward flow and congestion determines whether more filling is useful.

73.5 Venous Congestion Is Not Useful Preload

Systemic venous return depends on an effective upstream-to-downstream pressure relationship and the conductance of the pathways between them. In a simplified model:

Pmsf is mean systemic filling pressure, the equilibrium pressure of the systemic vasculature at zero flow. PRA is right atrial pressure; both pressures are in mmHg. RVR is resistance to venous return in mmHg/(L/min), giving flow in L/min. These quantities require compatible references and an interpretable flow model.

Assume hypothetical values of Pmsf 20 mmHg, PRA 10 mmHg, and RVR 2 mmHg/(L/min). Return is approximately 5 L/min. If PRA rises to 16 while the other parameters remain fixed, flow falls to 2 L/min. The higher atrial pressure does not represent better circulatory filling under those assumptions.

Real thoracic pressure changes can also alter upstream pressure, venous resistance, and collapsible segments. Fessler and colleagues demonstrated such effects in a canine bypass preparation during positive end-expiratory pressure. Right atrial pressure alone therefore cannot describe the full venous-return response or be corrected using a fixed fraction of airway pressure. 5

When the right heart cannot empty, elevated venous pressure can transmit congestion to the kidney, liver, and other tissues. Their perfusion and filtration depend on both arterial and downstream conditions. Raising upstream volume can worsen that environment without producing a worthwhile increase in pulmonary or systemic flow.

Conversely, a patient can have inadequate effective filling together with an elevated atmospheric-reference pressure if surrounding pressure is high. The distinction requires respiratory conditions, chamber geometry, and flow rather than labeling every high central venous pressure as excess total body volume.

Fluid responsiveness, fluid need, and fluid tolerance remain separate questions. A temporary flow response does not establish that the benefit will persist or outweigh congestion, and failure of a technically inadequate test proves little. A mechanical emergency also should not be delayed while completing an elaborate filling assessment.

The useful endpoint is sufficient forward flow with acceptable congestion, rather than the highest achievable filling pressure.

73.6 Tamponade Limits Filling Through External Constraint

Pericardial fluid becomes hemodynamically important when its pressure and mechanical effects impede cardiac filling. The rate of accumulation and pericardial accommodation matter as much as the amount. A rapidly developing collection can be consequential at a volume that a slowly adapting pericardium might accommodate differently.

Effusion size is therefore not synonymous with tamponade. The physiological problem is the interaction between surrounding pressure, chamber pressure, compliance, and available filling. Localized collections after surgery can impose regional compression without a uniform pressure field.

As external constraint increases, measured right-sided filling pressures can rise while the pressure distending the chambers remains small. The circulation requires greater upstream pressure to maintain a given volume. If that compensation is inadequate, stroke volume falls.

Respiration can produce exaggerated ventricular competition within the constrained enclosure. During spontaneous inspiration, increased right-sided filling can occur at the expense of left ventricular filling, contributing to an inspiratory reduction in systemic stroke volume and pulse pressure. Baseline left-heart pressure, ventilation, and regional anatomy modify the pattern.

Reddy and colleagues measured pressures before and during pericardial fluid removal in patients with effusion, including 14 with tamponade. Their observations linked improvement to release of pericardial constraint and demonstrated that some patients lacked the classic respiratory pattern when left-sided pressures were already high. Neither universal pressure equalization nor a particular pulse-pressure change is required in every clinical presentation. 6

Low circulating filling pressure can make a modest external pressure important, while preexisting pulmonary hypertension or high right-sided pressure can alter chamber-collapse findings. An absent familiar sign therefore does not remove the need to integrate the clinical and imaging evidence.

Increasing volume or vascular tone may temporarily alter the pressure balance but does not remove the external constraint. The cause, speed, distribution, and mechanical effect of the collection determine the physiological problem. Following pressure and flow after relief helps establish how much that constraint contributed, without making the prior presentation dependent on one mandatory number.

73.7 Tension-Related Thoracic Pressure Has Several Circulatory Effects

Pleural gas under adverse pressure conditions can impair circulation through more than direct cardiac compression. Changes in venous return, regional pulmonary vascular flow, lung volume, and gas exchange interact. The pressure reaching the mediastinum or opposite hemithorax need not equal pressure in the affected pleural space.

Positive-pressure ventilation changes this process because respiratory pressure swings and delivered gas differ from spontaneous breathing. A ventilated patient can develop rapid flow impairment without the same compensatory inspiratory pressure pattern available to an awake spontaneously breathing subject.

Bitto and colleagues studied progressive pneumothorax in five mechanically ventilated sheep. Cardiac output fell while several measured filling pressures rose, and arterial oxygen tension remained relatively preserved. This model demonstrates why acceptable oxygenation and elevated venous pressure do not exclude an important mechanical flow problem. It does not define a human volume or pressure threshold. 7

In contrast, Hurewitz and colleagues studied awake standing sheep and observed compensation through respiratory and heart-rate responses despite declining stroke volume and worsening oxygen transport. Differences between preparations reinforce that the sequence of hypoxemia, tachycardia, hypotension, and collapse depends on the breathing state and reserve. 8

The clinical implication is a mechanistic caution rather than a checklist requiring every classic sign. A sudden pressure–flow deterioration during ventilation needs rapid assessment of a thoracic mechanical cause alongside embolism, myocardial dysfunction, and other possibilities. Waiting for profound desaturation or one radiographic appearance can miss the physiological stage already affecting flow.

Not every pneumothorax produces obstructive shock, and not every high airway pressure indicates pleural gas. Airway obstruction, hyperinflation, poor compliance, and patient effort can produce other patterns. The diagnosis requires the whole clinical situation and appropriate imaging when compatible with the urgency.

Relief of the relevant pressure source addresses a different mechanism from thrombus removal or pericardial decompression. Their shared low-output endpoint should not obscure that anatomical distinction.

73.8 Dynamic Hyperinflation Can Sustain Obstruction During Expiration

When expiration is incomplete before the next inflation begins, end-expiratory lung volume can increase above its passive equilibrium. Intrinsic PEEP describes the associated residual pressure in communicating regions under suitable measurement conditions. Volume trapping and measured intrinsic pressure are related but different observations.

The circulatory effect can persist throughout the cycle. Increased intrathoracic pressure alters venous return, while elevated lung volume can compress alveolar vessels and increase right ventricular outflow load. Applied external PEEP can be modest even when the total mechanical burden is substantial.

Tuxen and Lane studied nine sedated, paralyzed patients with severe airflow obstruction under several ventilation patterns. Shortening expiratory opportunity or increasing tidal volume increased hyperinflation, with associated pressure changes and hypotension at high volumes. Peak airway pressure did not reliably represent the trapped-volume burden. The historical experimental settings are not prescriptions for present patients. 9

The mechanism explains why lowering inspiratory flow can improve a displayed peak pressure while lengthening inspiration and leaving less time for expiration. Likewise, increasing ventilation to improve carbon dioxide clearance can worsen trapping if expiratory capacity cannot accommodate the added volume.

An expiratory hold can estimate intrinsic pressure only when effort and communication conditions permit interpretation. Active expiratory muscle contraction can alter the result, and closed regions may not transmit their trapped pressure to the airway opening. A small measured value therefore does not exclude important regional hyperinflation.

Circulatory deterioration also requires assessment for other causes. A close temporal relationship to a ventilator change supports a mechanical contribution but does not exclude concurrent embolism, pneumothorax, myocardial injury, or medication effects.

Restoring a more tolerable lung-volume and pressure state can improve return and ejection, but the appropriate respiratory change depends on the actual obstruction, flow limitation, effort, and gas-exchange needs. There is no universal external PEEP, rate, tidal volume, or disconnection rule derived from the mechanism. Chapters 25 and 76 develop the obstructive respiratory physiology in greater detail.

73.9 Ventilation, Blood Gases, and Myocardial Reserve Interact

Hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and acidemia can increase pulmonary vascular tone, while gas-exchange failure and increased respiratory work raise systemic demand. Their correction can reduce part of the right ventricular load, but the method used to correct them can introduce another mechanical cost.

Recruiting collapsed lung may improve regional vascular conditions and reduce hypoxic vasoconstriction. Excess inflation can increase alveolar vascular compression. The same increase in airway pressure can therefore improve one region and worsen another, with the net result depending on lung and chest-wall mechanics.

Mekontso Dessap and colleagues identified acute cor pulmonale in a prospective cohort receiving protective ventilation for moderate-to-severe ARDS. The finding demonstrates that a lung-protective strategy does not eliminate clinically important right ventricular loading. Observed associations with respiratory conditions are not universal causal thresholds for every patient. 10

Prone positioning can change inflation distribution, gas exchange, and vascular load. Vieillard-Baron and colleagues observed reduced right ventricular enlargement and septal abnormalities in selected severe ARDS patients with acute cor pulmonale after prone ventilation. This physiological study supports an unloading mechanism in that population; it is not a universal recommendation for every form of obstructive shock or a stand-alone survival trial. 11

The transition to intubation and positive pressure can expose limited reserve through simultaneous changes in respiratory effort, venous return, pulmonary load, vascular tone, and drug effects. A subsequent pressure drop cannot be assigned to positive pressure alone without considering induction, disease progression, and other mechanical complications.

Spontaneous breathing is not automatically benign either. Severe effort increases oxygen demand and pressure swings, potentially worsening the load on a failing circulation. Assisted ventilation can relieve that work while creating different loading conditions.

The relevant comparison therefore follows both gas exchange and circulation: forward flow, systemic pressure, right ventricular geometry, congestion, and respiratory mechanics. An intervention that improves arterial oxygen content can still reduce oxygen delivery if cardiac output falls sufficiently.

73.10 Hemodynamics and Echocardiography Provide Patterns, Not Complete Diagnoses

Echocardiography can identify right ventricular size and motion, septal displacement, valve abnormalities, pericardial collections, and left ventricular filling patterns. Each observation needs its loading and anatomical context. A dilated right ventricle is not specific for acute pulmonary embolism.

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, or TAPSE, describes longitudinal annular movement rather than total effective forward output. In mechanically ventilated septic-shock patients, Vieillard-Baron and colleagues found that a research phenotype combining right ventricular dilation and congestion could coexist with apparently preserved TAPSE. The population and study definition do not provide a universal diagnostic cutoff, but they demonstrate the limitation of one motion measure. 12

Pulmonary pressure estimates also depend on signal quality and assumptions. A tricuspid regurgitant velocity estimates a pressure difference, and deriving right ventricular systolic pressure requires an appropriate atrial-pressure estimate. Equating that with pulmonary artery pressure additionally assumes no important intervening outflow obstruction.

Invasive pressure–flow calculations remain conditional:

mPAP is mean pulmonary artery pressure and PAWP pulmonary artery wedge pressure in mmHg; Q is cardiac output in L/min. Pulmonary vascular resistance, PVR, is expressed in Wood units, equivalent to mmHg·min/L. PAWP must validly represent the relevant downstream pressure, and the pressure references and respiratory conditions must be interpretable.

For an illustrative first state, mPAP is 35 mmHg, PAWP 10 mmHg, and Q 3 L/min: PVR is 25 ÷ 3 ≈ 8.3 Wood units. Later, mPAP falls to 28 with PAWP still 10 and Q 2 L/min: PVR is 18 ÷ 2 = 9 Wood units. Pulmonary pressure fell while calculated resistance increased and flow deteriorated.

The example is not a diagnostic criterion for embolism or a treatment target. It shows why pressure reduction must be interpreted with flow. Waveforms, surrounding pressure, valve regurgitation, regional anatomy, and direct evidence of the suspected cause determine the final explanation.

73.11 Relieving a Cause and Providing a Bridge Are Different Tasks

Removing pulmonary obstruction, releasing pericardial or pleural constraint, and restoring coronary perfusion address different causes. Pressure support, inotropic effects, rhythm correction, and respiratory adjustments can preserve function while the causal intervention takes effect, but they do not automatically remove the bottleneck.

Supporting systemic arterial pressure can improve coronary conditions, while its net effect also depends on myocardial work and pulmonary and systemic vascular responses. Increasing contractility may improve ejection while raising oxygen demand. No universal pressure or drug dose follows from these tradeoffs.

Recent pulmonary embolism trials illustrate why outcome claims need precise populations. HI-PEITHO and PRAGUE-26 found lower short-term composite event rates with catheter-directed fibrinolytic strategies than with anticoagulation alone in selected intermediate-risk cohorts. The effects were driven mainly by less cardiorespiratory decompensation or collapse; these were not trials establishing a universal mortality benefit in patients already in obstructive shock. Bleeding remains part of the benefit–harm interpretation. 13, 14

PEERLESS compared large-bore mechanical thrombectomy with catheter-directed thrombolysis in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Its hierarchical outcome favored thrombectomy, importantly through deterioration/bailout and intensive-care utilization, without a significant mortality or major-bleeding difference. The trial did not compare either procedure with anticoagulation alone and cannot establish equivalence among all devices or benefit across every shock phenotype. 15

These findings cannot be replaced by the observation that right ventricular size or pulmonary pressure improved. Physiological recovery and procedural outcomes answer related but distinct questions, and anatomic success may still leave residual vascular, myocardial, or gas-exchange limitations.

Extracorporeal support can provide selected patients with a bridge, but the configuration determines which circulation is supported, whether oxygenation is supplied, and what new ventricular loading is created. It does not itself resolve every obstruction or restore injured myocardium. Chapter 79 develops those mechanisms and evidence.

The integrated task is to support perfusion while identifying and addressing the cause, then reassess whether the limiting mechanism has actually changed.

73.12 An Integrated Pressure–Flow Case

Consider a constructed patient with confirmed acute pulmonary embolism who deteriorates during respiratory support. The right ventricle is enlarged, the septum displaced, and the left ventricular cavity small. Heart rate is 110 beats/min and forward stroke volume 30 mL/beat. Cardiac output is 110 × 30 = 3300 mL/min, or 3.30 L/min.

With arterial oxygen content assumed to be 18 mL/dL, systemic delivery is 3.30 × 18 × 10 = 594 mL oxygen/min. The factor 10 converts L to dL. These measurements describe inadequate flow relative to the clinical situation; they are not universal thresholds defining shock.

The known embolism supplies one cause of afterload, but it need not explain the entire deterioration. Increased lung volume, intrinsic PEEP, altered effort, induction-related vascular changes, arrhythmia, or another mechanical complication may have added a second limitation. An elevated CVP does not decide whether the dominant new change is external pressure, congestion from poor ejection, or both.

Suppose a technically adequate temporary increase in filling raises atrial pressure without a flow change exceeding measurement uncertainty. That result does not support more volume as a reliable way to improve output under the tested conditions. It also does not remove the need for prompt causal treatment or prove that all future filling responses will be identical.

After relevant loading contributors and the cause are addressed, suppose heart rate is 105 and forward stroke volume 45 mL/beat. Output is 4725 mL/min, or 4.725 L/min. If arterial content remains 18 mL/dL, delivery is approximately 851 mL/min. The improvement is a constructed combined response, not evidence that one component alone produced it.

The interpretation should also follow systemic pressure, venous congestion, right and left ventricular geometry, gas exchange, and organ perfusion. A lower pulmonary pressure is favorable when it accompanies useful forward recovery; it is concerning when pressure falls because the pump has lost capacity.

Obstructive and right ventricular shock become more intelligible when every observation is linked to the pathway that limits flow. Pressure matters through the gradients, loads, and constraints it represents, while recovery requires the circulation to deliver blood effectively through the whole system.

References

1. Gold FL, Bache RJ. Influence of systolic intracavity pressure on right ventricular perfusion in the awake dog. Cardiovasc Res. 1982;16:467–472. Original experimental study.

2. Rain S, Handoko ML, Trip P, et al. Right ventricular diastolic impairment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2013;128:2016–2025. Original human physiological study.

3. Bowers TR, O'Neill WW, Grines C, et al. Effect of reperfusion on biventricular function and survival after right ventricular infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:933–940. Original clinical study.

4. Belenkie I, Dani R, Smith ER, Tyberg JV. Effects of volume loading during experimental acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1989;80:178–188. Original experimental study.

5. Fessler HE, Brower RG, Wise RA, Permutt S. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the canine venous return curve. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:4–10. Original experimental study.

6. Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, O'Toole JD, Shaver JA. Cardiac tamponade: hemodynamic observations in man. Circulation. 1978;58:265–272. Original human physiology study.

7. Bitto T, Mannion JD, Stephenson LW, et al. Pneumothorax during positive-pressure mechanical ventilation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89:585–591. Original experimental study.

8. Hurewitz AN, Sidhu U, Bergofsky EH, et al. Cardiovascular and respiratory consequences of tension pneumothorax. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1986;22:545–549. Original experimental study.

9. Tuxen DV, Lane S. The effects of ventilatory pattern on hyperinflation, airway pressures, and circulation in mechanical ventilation of patients with severe air-flow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136:872–879. Original clinical physiology study.

10. Mekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, et al. Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:862–870. Original clinical cohort.

11. Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Caille V, et al. Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS. Chest. 2007;132:1440–1446. Original clinical physiology study.

12. Vieillard-Baron A, Prigent A, Repessé X, et al. Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness. Crit Care. 2020;24:630. Original clinical cohort.

13. Rosenfield K, Klok FA, Piazza G, et al. Ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2026;394:1979–1990. Original HI-PEITHO randomized trial.

14. Kroupa J, Radvan M, Mrozek J, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis in intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. Published online August 31, 2026. Original PRAGUE-26 randomized trial.

15. Jaber WA, Gonsalves CF, Stortecky S, et al. Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in the management of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: primary results of the PEERLESS randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2025;151:260–273. Original randomized trial.