Sodium and Water Homeostasis

Sodium balance helps determine extracellular fluid volume. Water balance strongly influences the concentration of sodium measured in blood. These control systems interact, but they answer different physiological questions. This chapter follows sodium and water from filtration and tubular transport to hormonal regulation, urine composition, and whole-body balance. It establishes the handling mechanisms without turning a concentration or clearance into a treatment prescription.

45.1 Sodium Amount and Sodium Concentration Describe Different States

Sodium is the principal extracellular cation. Its accompanying anions contribute to the extracellular osmotic environment, helping retain water outside cells. When sodium salts accumulate and water is available, extracellular volume generally expands. When sodium salts are lost, extracellular volume can contract.

Serum sodium concentration instead describes the amount of sodium within a specified volume of serum. It is a ratio. The same sodium amount can produce different concentrations when the associated water changes, and similar concentrations can occur in patients with very different total sodium stores.

This distinction explains otherwise puzzling combinations. A patient with edema may have accumulated sodium and water while the serum sodium concentration has fallen because water increased disproportionately. A patient losing hypotonic fluid can lose sodium while the concentration rises because proportionately more water was lost. Sodium concentration alone cannot identify sodium balance.

Extracellular volume and arterial circulatory adequacy are also different. Retained fluid may accumulate in the interstitium or a low-pressure vascular compartment without restoring effective organ perfusion. A normal serum sodium does not establish normal volume distribution, and a low concentration does not establish total sodium depletion.

Whole-body balance provides the separate accounting framework:

Amounts are expressed in mmol over a defined interval. For monovalent sodium, one mmol is numerically one mEq. Sodium delivered in nutrition, medication carriers, flushes, blood products, and other administered fluids belongs in the intake term. Gastrointestinal, skin, drain, and extracorporeal losses belong in the relevant output terms.

Balance is harder to measure than the equation suggests. Collections may be incomplete, treatment inputs may be omitted, and tissue distribution changes can obscure the relation between external balance and measured compartments. The first requirement is nevertheless simple: record sodium amount and water amount separately before interpreting their concentration. Their physiological effects can then be connected rather than assumed identical.

45.2 The Edelman Relationship Connects Exchangeable Cations with Body Water

Edelman and colleagues measured exchangeable sodium, exchangeable potassium, total body water, and serum composition in a heterogeneous group of chronically ill patients. Sodium concentration correlated with the combined cation-to-water ratio more closely than with either cation alone. Their fitted relationship was:

Na_e and K_e are isotope-defined exchangeable sodium and potassium in mEq, numerically equivalent to mmol for these monovalent ions. TBW is total body water in liters. The concentration and intercept are in mEq/L of serum water. The original water-corrected concentration is not identical to an ordinary laboratory result expressed per liter of serum. 1

The slope and intercept are empirical coefficients rather than universal physical constants. Exchangeable stores are not simply a beaker of dissolved salts, and the measurements and compartment assumptions matter. The regression describes a population relationship with scatter; it does not make every acute sodium change precisely predictable.

Potassium appears because intracellular cations help determine water distribution between compartments. A change in body potassium can therefore influence extracellular sodium concentration even though most potassium resides inside cells. Detailed potassium handling belongs to the next chapter, but excluding potassium entirely from a sodium balance model can miss a relevant numerator change.

A simpler teaching approximation relates sodium concentration to effective sodium-plus-potassium content divided by body water. Suppose an illustrative patient starts at 140 mmol/L with 40 L of body water. If effective cation content remains constant while water increases to 41 L, proportional dilution gives 140 × 40 ÷ 41 ≈ 136.6 mmol/L.

That calculation uses the simplified proportional model, not the original fitted coefficients. It assumes equilibration and no intervening cation gain, loss, or other major osmotic redistribution. Its purpose is to show why retained water can lower sodium concentration without sodium loss. Serial measurements remain necessary when inputs, renal excretion, glucose, and body composition are changing.

45.3 The Filtered Sodium Load Is Large Compared with Final Excretion

Glomerular filtration delivers sodium into the nephron. Because plasma sodium is largely freely filterable, the filtered load is approximated by:

GFR is glomerular filtration rate. Use liters per unit time with concentration in mmol/L to obtain mmol per unit time. The approximation ignores small differences related to plasma water and ionic distribution; these are not the dominant issue in the illustrative calculation.

Take GFR of 100 mL/min and plasma sodium of 140 mmol/L. GFR is 0.100 × 1,440 = 144 L/day. The filtered sodium load is 144 × 140 = 20,160 mmol/day. If urine contains 140 mmol of sodium over that day, about 140 ÷ 20,160 × 100 ≈ 0.69% of the filtered load was excreted and approximately 99.3% was reabsorbed.

The example explains why small fractional transport changes can substantially alter external balance. At the same filtered load, an additional one percentage point escaping reabsorption would represent 0.01 × 20,160 ≈ 202 mmol/day. Actual excretion also depends on downstream compensation and the change in filtration itself.

The proximal tubule reabsorbs the bulk of filtered sodium together with water. Basolateral Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase maintains a low intracellular sodium concentration, supplying the gradient for apical sodium entry. Sodium enters with glucose, amino acids, phosphate, and other solutes, and through sodium–hydrogen exchange. Water follows through transcellular and paracellular pathways, so proximal fluid remains approximately isosmotic.

Preisig and colleagues used in vivo microperfusion in rat proximal tubules to demonstrate a major contribution of sodium–hydrogen exchange to bicarbonate absorption. This illustrates a specific transport mechanism; the experiment does not quantify the entire human proximal sodium flux. 2

Proximal reabsorption changes with filtered delivery, neurohumoral signals, and peritubular conditions. The fraction reaching later segments therefore reflects coordinated transport rather than a fixed conveyor belt. A fall in filtered load can reduce sodium excretion even without increased fractional reabsorption.

45.4 Later Segments Separate Salt Transport from Water Permeability

The thick ascending limb reabsorbs sodium chloride while remaining relatively impermeable to water. The apical NKCC2 cotransporter moves sodium, potassium, and two chloride ions into the cell. Potassium recycling supports transport and the lumen-positive electrical environment. Basolateral sodium pumping and chloride exit complete transepithelial transport.

Removing solute without equivalent water dilutes tubular fluid and contributes to medullary concentration. Rocha and Kokko demonstrated salt removal with little osmotic water movement in isolated rabbit medullary thick ascending limbs. Their work established the functional separation between salt transport and water permeability; the historical mechanistic interpretation preceded modern transporter identification. 3

The distal convoluted tubule continues sodium chloride reabsorption through NCC, the sodium–chloride cotransporter, with limited water permeability in its early portion. Gamba and colleagues cloned and functionally expressed an electroneutral sodium–chloride cotransporter from winter flounder bladder. This foundational molecular experiment characterized transport properties relevant to the mammalian distal system; it was not a human segmental clearance measurement. 4

In the late distal nephron, connecting tubule, and collecting system, epithelial sodium channels, or ENaC, permit electrogenic sodium entry. Canessa and colleagues demonstrated the functional assembly of ENaC subunits using expression studies. Sodium entry through this pathway helps create conditions supporting potassium secretion, linking the final adjustment of sodium balance with potassium handling. 5

Water permeability is regulated separately, especially in the collecting duct. Reabsorbing sodium does not require that water follow in a fixed ratio through every segment. The urine can become dilute when salt is removed while water permeability remains low, or concentrated when water permeability rises in a suitable medullary gradient.

The late nephron handles less sodium than the proximal system but has considerable influence over final excretion. Its delivery, transport capacity, hormonal regulation, and adaptation determine how much of the remaining load escapes. This organization also explains why altering one transport site can provoke compensation elsewhere, a topic developed in the diuretic chapter.

45.5 Effective Arterial Circulatory Filling Regulates Sodium Retention

The kidney responds to signals of circulatory adequacy rather than measuring total extracellular volume directly. Arterial baroreceptor input, renal perfusion conditions, sympathetic activity, and distal sodium chloride delivery contribute to that response. The term effective arterial blood volume summarizes the functional arterial filling sensed by these systems; it is not a separately measurable anatomical fluid compartment.

Renin release increases with appropriate combinations of reduced afferent arteriolar pressure, renal sympathetic stimulation, and reduced sodium chloride delivery to the macula densa. Renin generates angiotensin I from angiotensinogen, followed by formation of angiotensin II. Angiotensin II influences vascular tone, tubular sodium transport, aldosterone secretion, and thirst.

Aldosterone acts through mineralocorticoid signaling to increase sodium transport capacity in responsive distal segments. Renal sympathetic activity can stimulate renin and sodium reabsorption while also changing vascular resistance. These responses can preserve arterial pressure and extracellular supply during genuine volume loss, but they can also promote accumulation when circulatory signaling remains abnormal.

Heart failure provides an important example. Total extracellular sodium and water may be increased while impaired forward performance and altered vascular distribution sustain sodium-retaining signals. Goldsmith and colleagues found increased vasopressin in a studied group with advanced heart failure, alongside assessment of other neurohumoral and hemodynamic variables. The finding supports disturbed volume–water signaling without making one hormone level a measure of total volume. 6

Cirrhosis can similarly combine expanded extracellular fluid with splanchnic vasodilation and reduced effective arterial filling. Sepsis adds changing vasoplegia, permeability, cardiac function, and treatment effects. In these settings, edema and renal sodium retention can coexist with inadequate arterial perfusion.

The physiological meaning of sodium retention therefore depends on the circulation. A low urine sodium concentration cannot establish that the patient lacks total-body sodium or that administered fluid will increase output. It reports the result of delivery and transport under current conditions, while fluid responsiveness and tolerance require their own assessment.

45.6 Natriuretic Signals and Pressure Feedback Limit Continuing Retention

Sodium retention raises extracellular volume and can increase vascular filling and arterial pressure. These changes normally recruit opposing mechanisms. Suppression of renin and sympathetic drive, changes in tubular reabsorption, and cardiac natriuretic peptides help increase sodium excretion toward intake.

Atrial natriuretic peptide is released in response to cardiac filling and stretch. Its actions include effects on renal vascular and tubular function and inhibition of sodium-retaining hormonal systems. De Bold and colleagues demonstrated a powerful natriuretic response to atrial myocardial extracts in anesthetized rats, unlike ventricular extracts. This foundational experiment established a cardiac influence on renal salt excretion; it did not establish a treatment benefit from administering a natriuretic drug. 7

Pressure natriuresis describes increased sodium excretion as renal perfusion pressure rises under specified conditions. The response can include changes in filtration and, importantly, fractional tubular reabsorption. Its relation to pressure shifts with neurohumoral state, kidney function, and chronic disease. It should not be reduced to a fixed pressure threshold at which every kidney excretes salt.

Aldosterone escape illustrates the integrated feedback. During sustained mineralocorticoid exposure, initial sodium retention can give way to renewed balance despite continued hormone exposure. Hall and colleagues studied dogs in which renal arterial pressure either increased or was experimentally prevented from rising. Their results demonstrated the importance of the pressure response for escape in that preparation. 8

Escape means that excretion again approaches intake; it does not necessarily mean that the previously retained sodium, expanded volume, or higher pressure has disappeared. Nor does it imply escape from every potassium or cardiovascular effect of mineralocorticoid excess.

In heart failure or cirrhosis, the balance between retaining and excreting signals may remain displaced. Elevated natriuretic peptide concentrations can coexist with persistent retention because concentration does not guarantee an adequate renal response. The eventual steady state reflects the whole regulatory system, including renal perfusion, transport capacity, and continuing sodium delivery.

45.7 Vasopressin and Thirst Regulate Water Through Different Effectors

Rising effective plasma concentration stimulates osmoregulatory pathways that promote vasopressin release and thirst. Vasopressin, also called antidiuretic hormone, conserves water through the kidney. Thirst promotes water intake through behavior. Both systems are needed because conserving available water cannot replace water that is absent.

Vasopressin activates basolateral V2 receptors in collecting-duct principal cells. Intracellular signaling, including cyclic AMP pathways, increases aquaporin-2 availability at the apical membrane. Water can then enter the cell and leave through basolateral pathways, provided the surrounding interstitium supplies an osmotic gradient.

Nielsen and colleagues measured water permeability and channel distribution in perfused rat collecting ducts. Vasopressin increased apical localization of the collecting-duct water channel, and withdrawal reversed both localization and permeability changes. This directly connects regulated channel trafficking with water transport. 9

Vasopressin is also released through nonosmotic pathways. Reduced circulatory filling, hypotension, nausea, pain, and other stress signals can sustain antidiuresis even when plasma sodium is low. Water supplied during that state may be retained disproportionately. Conversely, disappearance of the stimulus can permit a rapid increase in dilute urine, changing water balance despite unchanged prescribed intake.

Thompson and colleagues demonstrated coordinated increases in thirst and vasopressin during osmotic stimulation in healthy volunteers. Their fitted thresholds describe the experimental population and method; they should not be used as fixed activation points for every critically ill patient. 10

An intubated, delirious, neurologically impaired, or physically dependent patient may sense thirst but be unable to obtain water. Another may have impaired thirst signaling itself. Recorded intake therefore reflects access, prescribed support, and behavior, not simply the integrity of osmoregulation.

Renal response also depends on more than vasopressin concentration. Collecting-duct responsiveness, medullary gradients, filtration, and distal delivery determine the effect. A hormone signal can be present while the kidney still fails to concentrate urine adequately.

45.8 Concentration Requires a Medullary Gradient as Well as Water Permeability

Making concentrated urine requires a gradient drawing water from the collecting duct and a pathway through which it can move. Vasopressin opens the regulated water pathway; it does not independently create every component of the medullary gradient.

The loop arrangement and different segmental permeabilities support countercurrent multiplication. Salt reabsorption from water-impermeable ascending segments helps concentrate the interstitium while diluting tubular fluid. Water can leave sufficiently water-permeable descending segments as they encounter a more concentrated environment. Repetition along adjacent, oppositely directed flows establishes a gradient along the medulla.

Urea recycling contributes particularly to the inner medullary solute environment. Vasa recta countercurrent exchange helps supply blood while limiting washout of the gradient. Medullary architecture, blood flow, solute delivery, and transporter activity all influence the resulting concentrating capacity. The detailed quantitative generation of the inner medullary gradient is more complex than a single salt pump diagram.

Gottschalk and Mylle used micropuncture measurements in rodents to compare fluid composition along tubules and medullary vessels. Their findings supplied experimental support for the countercurrent model, including hyperosmotic fluid at deep loop, collecting-duct, and vascular sites. The study established key relationships without making every human concentrating response identical to the experimental preparation. 11

Producing dilute urine requires another combination: sufficient filtrate must reach water-impermeable salt-absorbing segments, salt transport must function, and later water permeability must remain sufficiently low. Low vasopressin alone may not produce a large water excretion if GFR or distal delivery is severely limited.

Critical illness can impair either side. Tubular injury and altered transport can limit dilution or concentration. Increased medullary blood flow or reduced solute accumulation can weaken the gradient. Recovery from obstruction or acute kidney injury can change transport and delivery over time.

Urine concentration is therefore a functional result of several linked processes. It cannot be interpreted as a direct assay of vasopressin or an isolated measure of hydration.

45.9 Solute Excretion Places Limits on the Water Volume the Kidney Can Excrete

Urine must carry the solute presented for excretion. For a given solute amount, urine volume depends on the concentration the kidney achieves:

Daily osmole excretion is in mOsm/day and urine osmolality in mOsm/kg of water. The quotient is kilograms of water per day, approximated here as L/day. The approximation treats one liter of urine as approximately one kilogram of water; it is sufficient for these teaching calculations.

Suppose an illustrative patient must excrete 600 mOsm/day. If the kidney can dilute the urine to 50 mOsm/kg, the corresponding volume is 600 ÷ 50 = 12 L/day. If daily solute excretion instead falls to 150 mOsm while the same minimum osmolality remains attainable, the volume becomes 150 ÷ 50 = 3 L/day.

These are assumed capabilities, not normal values guaranteed for an ICU patient. The calculation shows why low dietary protein and electrolyte intake can limit water excretion even when vasopressin is appropriately suppressed. If water intake exceeds the attainable excretion plus other losses, body water accumulates.

The concentrating limit determines a minimum required urine volume. With 600 mOsm/day to excrete and an assumed maximum achievable urine osmolality of 600 mOsm/kg, at least 600 ÷ 600 = 1 L/day is required for that solute load. Increasing solute excretion to 900 mOsm/day at the same limit requires 900 ÷ 600 = 1.5 L/day.

Catabolism, nutrition, glucose excretion, and administered solutes can change the load. A patient may therefore have substantial urine volume despite antidiuretic signaling because solute excretion requires accompanying water. Urea can contribute strongly to urine osmolality while influencing transcellular water distribution differently from sodium salts, a distinction developed further in Chapter 47.

The equation describes a constraint, not a safe water intake or replacement prescription. GFR, distal delivery, actual hormone state, changing solute generation, nonrenal losses, and accessible intake must also be known. A theoretical maximum excretion should not be mistaken for the observed output.

45.10 Urine Concentrations Must Be Converted into Excretion Rates

A spot urine sodium concentration describes sodium per volume of urine. The amount excreted requires urine volume over the corresponding interval:

With urine sodium of 40 mmol/L and volume of 2 L/day, excretion is 40 × 2 = 80 mmol/day. At the same concentration but volume of 0.5 L/day, it is 40 × 0.5 = 20 mmol/day. The identical concentration describes a fourfold difference in sodium loss.

Urine sodium and potassium together help interpret water excretion relative to electrolyte content. Urine osmolality adds all measured particles, including urea and glucose when present. These variables answer different questions and should be paired with a contemporaneous plasma sample and a representative urine interval.

Urine composition changes after fluids, nutrition, altered vascular tone, hormone changes, diuretics, or recovery of filtration. A sample collected during one phase may not describe the next several hours. Bladder urine can also combine production from an earlier state with current observations.

A low urine sodium or low fractional sodium excretion can indicate active conservation, but neither reliably identifies one structural diagnosis or predicts benefit from a fluid bolus. Vanmassenhove and colleagues found low fractional sodium and urea excretion commonly during early sepsis across evolving kidney states. Their observational findings illustrate the limits of applying a simple low-excretion label to critical illness. 12

Low urine output likewise does not specify sodium excretion, water conservation, filtration, or the cause of kidney dysfunction by itself. Conversely, a large urine volume does not prove effective sodium removal or absence of clinically important water loss.

Interpretation should therefore combine urine volume, osmolality, sodium, potassium, major additional solutes, and measured intake. External losses and changing plasma composition complete the balance. The purpose is to explain the current renal contribution, while circulatory assessment and serial kidney measurements address whether perfusion, congestion, or injury is changing.

45.11 Osmolar and Electrolyte-Free Water Clearances Describe Different Comparisons

Osmolar clearance expresses the volume of plasma water containing the same total osmoles excreted in urine. Conventional free water clearance is the urine volume remaining after that comparison:

U_osm and P_osm are urine and plasma osmolalities in mOsm/kg. V is urine flow, here in L/day, and the clearances use the same time unit. These volume clearances use the usual approximation relating urine volume to water mass.

Take illustrative V of 2 L/day, U_osm of 600 mOsm/kg, and P_osm of 300 mOsm/kg. Osmolar clearance is 600 × 2 ÷ 300 = 4 L/day. Free water clearance is 2 − 4 = −2 L/day. The urine is concentrated relative to plasma when all measured osmoles are counted.

Electrolyte-free water clearance instead compares urine sodium plus potassium with plasma sodium:

All electrolyte concentrations are in mmol/L. This convention neglects the small plasma potassium term and treats sodium and potassium salts as the principal relevant electrolytes. With U_Na of 40, U_K of 30, and P_Na of 140 mmol/L, the same urine gives 2 × [1 − 70 ÷ 140] = +1 L/day. The positive result means excretion of water in excess of the amount associated with those urinary cations at the plasma sodium reference.

Rose developed this electrolyte-centered approach to explain why total osmolar clearance can obscure the sodium-relevant water balance when urea dominates urine solute. It is a physiological accounting framework, not an isolated prediction of the next serum sodium. 13

Lindner and colleagues documented critically ill patients with urea-related osmotic diuresis in whom conventional free water clearance was negative while electrolyte-free water clearance was positive during rising sodium. Their retrospective series demonstrates the possible divergence, not its prevalence in every ICU. 14

Both clearances describe the kidney over the sampled interval. Neither includes intake, nonrenal losses, evolving cation stores, or all osmotic shifts. A negative electrolyte-free clearance also does not prove whole-body water accumulation if other losses exceed intake.

45.12 Integrate Salt and Water Mass Balance Before Explaining a Sodium Trend

Consider an illustrative day with sodium intake of 200 mmol, urinary loss of 80 mmol, and nonrenal loss of 20 mmol. Net sodium retention is 200 − 80 − 20 = 100 mmol. Suppose water intake is 3.5 L, urine volume 1 L, and other water losses total 0.5 L. Net water retention is 3.5 − 1.0 − 0.5 = 2 L.

Positive sodium balance and positive water balance have occurred together. Their relative magnitudes determine the direction of the concentration change. To illustrate that principle, use a simplified effective cation pool of 5,600 mmol and total body water of 40 L, giving 5,600 ÷ 40 = 140 mmol/L. This proportional teaching model does not apply the original Edelman regression coefficients.

Assume potassium balance is zero and all retained sodium enters the modeled effective pool. After the day, the ratio becomes (5,600 + 100) ÷ (40 + 2) = 5,700 ÷ 42 ≈ 135.7 mmol/L. Sodium concentration has fallen despite sodium accumulation. The calculation illustrates disproportionate water retention, not a precise forecast for the patient.

Now consider a separate loss example from the same starting model. Losing 100 mmol of combined effective sodium and potassium while losing 2 L of water gives 5,500 ÷ 38 ≈ 144.7 mmol/L. Cations were lost, but proportionately greater water loss increased their modeled concentration.

Real assessment must verify all inputs and losses, changing filtration and transport, glucose-related redistribution, measurement method, and the time needed for equilibration. Estimated body water and effective stores introduce uncertainty. Tissue binding and compartment behavior further limit a simple pool model.

The integrated interpretation should therefore state what changed in sodium amount, potassium amount, and water, then explain how the kidney and access to water contributed. Serum sodium is the observed concentration result. Its trajectory requires repeated measurements when conditions change, rather than conversion of one balance estimate into a correction rate or fluid prescription.

References

1. Edelman IS, Leibman J, O'Meara MP, Birkenfeld LW. Interrelations between serum sodium concentration, serum osmolarity and total exchangeable sodium, total exchangeable potassium and total body water. J Clin Invest. 1958;37:1236–1256.

2. Preisig PA, Ives HE, Cragoe EJ Jr, Alpern RJ, Rector FC Jr. Role of the Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter in rat proximal tubule bicarbonate absorption. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:970–978.

3. Rocha AS, Kokko JP. Sodium chloride and water transport in the medullary thick ascending limb of Henle: evidence for active chloride transport. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:612–623.

4. Gamba G, Saltzberg SN, Lombardi M, et al. Primary structure and functional expression of a cDNA encoding the thiazide-sensitive, electroneutral sodium-chloride cotransporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:2749–2753.

5. Canessa CM, Schild L, Buell G, et al. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na⁺ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature. 1994;367:463–467.

6. Goldsmith SR, Francis GS, Cowley AW Jr, Levine TB, Cohn JN. Increased plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:1385–1390.

7. de Bold AJ, Borenstein HB, Veress AT, Sonnenberg H. A rapid and potent natriuretic response to intravenous injection of atrial myocardial extract in rats. Life Sci. 1981;28:89–94.

8. Hall JE, Granger JP, Smith MJ Jr, Premen AJ. Role of renal hemodynamics and arterial pressure in aldosterone escape. Hypertension. 1984;6(Suppl I):I183–I192.

9. Nielsen S, Chou CL, Marples D, Christensen EI, Kishore BK, Knepper MA. Vasopressin increases water permeability of kidney collecting duct by inducing translocation of aquaporin-CD water channels to plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:1013–1017.

10. Thompson CJ, Bland J, Burd J, Baylis PH. The osmotic thresholds for thirst and vasopressin release are similar in healthy man. Clin Sci (Lond). 1986;71:651–656.

11. Gottschalk CW, Mylle M. Micropuncture study of the mammalian urinary concentrating mechanism: evidence for the countercurrent hypothesis. Am J Physiol. 1959;196:927–936.

12. Vanmassenhove J, Glorieux G, Hoste E, Dhondt A, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W. Urinary output and fractional excretion of sodium and urea as indicators of transient versus intrinsic acute kidney injury during early sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17:R234.

13. Rose BD. New approach to disturbances in the plasma sodium concentration. Am J Med. 1986;81:1033–1040.

14. Lindner G, Schwarz C, Funk GC. Osmotic diuresis due to urea as the cause of hypernatraemia in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:962–967.